The wording matched my rival's flyer, but the star was on my name
This account was submitted by a healthcare provider and de-identified before publication. Details that could identify a patient or practice have been removed, and it is shared with the provider’s consent.
The review gave two stars and steered readers toward "a newer office with cutting-edge care and no long waits." The phrasing lined up almost exactly with a flyer a competitor had recently mailed around town. It was smooth, promotional, and oddly free of any real detail about a visit to me. No procedure, no date, no interaction, just a vague dissatisfaction bending into an endorsement. It felt manufactured to redirect patients. I recognized the flyer's language the moment I read it. But my two-star rating does not come with that context.
A competing practice had blanketed the neighborhood with flyers advertising cutting-edge care and no long waits. The review reproduced that exact phrasing, which is what first raised my suspicion. Nothing in the post matched any appointment I could find or recall. I believe it was competitor-driven, but I have no way to prove authorship. I cannot examine records to disprove a visit that likely never occurred, and I cannot publicly state that no such patient exists without implying I checked a chart. HIPAA forbids even that. So a probable plant carries the weight of a real review.
A dental specialist who refers to me asked about the review, and I felt that relationship cool slightly. The two stars nudged my average down right as a rival was courting the same patients. My front desk staff, who pride themselves on short waits, were stung to see the opposite claimed. Morale dipped as the team sensed we were being deliberately targeted. The anxiety of watching a flyer's language become my public rating was maddening. I could not set the record straight without risking a breach. Being marketed against on my own profile is a peculiar and lonely frustration.
I reported the review to the platform as suspected competitor marketing and referenced the identical flyer language. They responded that authorship could not be verified and the review would remain. I asked about their policy on coordinated fake reviews and got a generic reply. My attorney said proving the competitor wrote it would require discovery I could not realistically obtain. I could not respond in detail without implying I had searched for a patient who may not exist. I posted a brief, neutral note and let it be. The review stands, echoing a competitor's flyer on my clinical page.