Providers deserve the right to respond while protecting patient privacy.
Provider Voices Read this story →Patients and caregivers can freely post reviews, complaints, and accusations online. Providers cannot respond — even to correct factual errors.
Online reviews have become the new word-of-mouth. Patients, caregivers, and anonymous critics post detailed accounts — sometimes inaccurate — on Google, Yelp, Facebook, Healthgrades, and Reddit, visible to millions.
HIPAA's privacy regulations prevent providers from confirming or denying that any patient encounter ever occurred — even when a patient has named them publicly and the allegations are demonstrably false.
Providers watch their reputations erode in public view, unable to defend themselves. Referrals drop. Practices lose revenue. Careers are damaged. Emotional distress and burnout increase.
The RESPOND Act proposes a narrow expansion of HIPAA's existing framework — not to eliminate protections, but to restore basic fairness when a patient has already spoken publicly.
When a patient voluntarily discloses treatment details in a public forum, providers may offer a brief, proportionate factual response — without revealing any new protected health information.
The amendment does not authorize disclosure of medical records, diagnoses, or any information beyond what the patient has already made public. HIPAA protections remain fully intact.
The RESPOND Act explicitly prohibits any use of the amendment to retaliate, threaten, or adversely affect a patient's care, coverage, or referral relationships.
Healthcare providers share how unanswered online reviews have affected their practices, their patients, and their lives.
No provider stories have been published yet. If unanswered online reviews have affected your practice, your patients, or your peace of mind, add your experience to the record.
Share Your Story →Join thousands of providers building the evidence and political will needed to achieve meaningful legislative reform. Every story submitted strengthens the case.