Accused of nerve damage from an extraction that went by the book

This account was submitted by a healthcare provider and de-identified before publication. Details that could identify a patient or practice have been removed, and it is shared with the provider’s consent.

What was posted

The review stated as fact that I had "caused permanent nerve damage" during a wisdom tooth extraction and called me "reckless."

What actually happened

The claim is false and I know exactly how the procedure and healing went, but explaining it publicly would mean disclosing the patient's clinical details, which I will not do.

Impact

On a surgeon's page, a phrase like nerve damage outweighs years of careful work, and consultation requests dropped noticeably.

Steps taken

I gathered records for an attorney, who warned that any public rebuttal risked disclosing protected information, so the claim stands.

Reported impact on this provider

Legal ConsultationReputation Damage

Three others reported Reputation Damage

See all 176 →

He Refused the ER—and His Family Believed We Sent Him Home

Pt with chief concern of urinary retention. He had obvious evidence of head trauma on exam (abrasions and a black eye if I recall…

Read what happened →

She Requested an Unnecessary Exam. I Couldn’t Explain Why I Refused.

The patient requested an exam that was not appropriate for her age. I declined to perform the exam she requested.

Read what happened →

False Reviews, Legal Threats, and Thoughts of Early Retirement

The post was not accurate. The patient presented with severe, rapidly progressing dental disease and repeatedly delayed or declined…

Read what happened →

Add your voice to the record

Behind every story is a career that deserved better.

If you have been affected, adding your story to the record is one of the most important contributions you can make to this campaign. Legislators read these accounts.

Every submission is de-identified before publication. Your privacy — and your patients’ — is protected.